Wednesday, January 30, 2008

peer review

should peer review be open or anonymous?

i believe it should be open because then people might be able to give better feedback. they will know who they are commenting on therefore they might be able to put it in a way thats more understandable. 

how much focus should be placed on low-order concerns such as grammar and punctuation?

i don't think any if not a little focus should be placed on these concerns. the grammar and punctuation can be altered by the computer and the main reason for the peer review is to make the authors work more structured in its message.

should a comment sheet be used? 

i think a comment sheet would be helpful but i also believe that we should be able to write on topics we get to choose. 
 


1 comment:

428thMP said...

yo, i haven't seen u in class, well soc. or english, were u in class today(intro to CJ)? hey if u missing hw or w/e or don't kno just call me dude (616)836-7794
aight then
asap